@article{oai:kobe-cufs.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001019,
 author = {Rosta, Andrew},
 journal = {神戸市外国語大学外国学研究, Annals of foreign studies},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {This paper is a critique of Hudson's (1990) analysis of English extraction, focusing on its empirical coverage of the English data, and endeavouring, in the process, to take a fresh look at the facts of extraction, rather than just assuming the usual litany of island constraints. I suggest some more and less minor revisions to the analysis, and note both cases where more drastic revision is called for and cases where the analysis enjoys unforeseen success., University of Central Lancashire},
 pages = {47--72},
 title = {Extraction and English word grammar},
 volume = {55},
 year = {2003}
}